Ruling Shields G.M. From Ignition Suits –

Alexander Hamilton U.S. Custom House
Alexander Hamilton U.S. Custom House courtesy Jim Henderson

Today, many were unhappy with Judge Robert E. Gerber’s opinion from the United States Bankruptcy Court in Manhattan. He ruled that General Motors was not liable for most ignition switch suits because of a liability shield clause in the 2009 General Motors bankruptcy. The New York Times explained, “Economic loss cases will be allowed to go forward, the judge ruled, only if they can be tied solely to actions by the post-bankruptcy company, known as New G.M., and ‘do not in any way rely on any acts or conduct’ by the pre-bankruptcy company.”

Families who planned to sue instead of take a settlement from the compensation fund are now barred from such legal action. Some expressed disappointment that now, General Motors can’t receive any fines for punitive damages nor will drivers who experienced financial losses be remunerated. Lawyers had estimated that the costs to GM would range from $7 to $10 billion.

Gerber’s ruling was based on the fact that, when GM declared bankruptcy,  the New GM bought Old GM’s assets without taking losses and liabilities related parts or vehicles made by the Old GM. Technically, the New GM is on paper a new company that was created in 2009 when the Old GM’s bankruptcy was discharged. Additionally, the judge was concerned with setting a precedent in which one class of creditors in a bankruptcy was given special dispensation not available to other creditors.

Steve Berman, co-lead counsel for plaintiffs against GM plans to appeal the ruling. “It cannot be the law that Old GM could hide the defects, and subsequently use the bankruptcy court as a shield. Evidence overwhelmingly shows that Old GM was aware of the deadly defect for years before the bankruptcy, but chose not to conduct a safety recall and concealed its knowledge of the defect from regulators and consumers. New GM continued the cover-up for years before finally issuing recalls beginning in February of 2014.”

While GM’s vigorous legal defense of the liability shield in the 2009 bankruptcy has a sound economic basis, the ethics of this defense is less clear.

What do you think of the Judge’s decision?

via Ruling Shields G.M. From Ignition Suits –


Published by


My husband likes to tease me by telling me I must be an alien. When I worked as a faculty member in a Business school, colleagues from other disciplines liked to say, “She’s not one of them.” I choose to take these comments as compliments and attribute them to the contradictory characteristics that define me. Highly analytical and results-oriented, I also approach interactions and challenges with empathy, curiosity, and wonder. I see myriad possibilities and delight at considering how to implement them. Since they are based on a solid theoretical foundation, most of them are reasonable and effective. In brainstorming conversations, others often respond to me by saying, “I didn’t think of that.” At the same time, I enjoy learning from everyone I meet, and I want everyone leaving a conversation with me to feel like they have been heard with compassion. My hobbies include knitting, making jewelry, reading, and hanging out with my husband and dogs. I am a long-time vegan committed to social justice and animal rights.

One thought on “Ruling Shields G.M. From Ignition Suits –”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s